-
Art, food and science: sensitivity, calibration and intensity
Sensors are the basics of perception. Any type of perception. If you need to know what the temperature of this room is, you could use a mercury thermometer. Previously to that, you need to find a material that is sensitive to temperature changes, like liquid mercury. Then, you need to define a scale just to have a sort of a base line and an idea of what it’s lot and what is tiny. Finally, you will need to use a code, or word, say it, express it, process it, and incorporate into other thoughts and more complex measurements.
This is just using technology, that of course, appears to be quite handy. But we, animals, can also perceive temperatures. Sadly, not so accurate than when using mercury, but in a survival way at least. I won’t be able to differentiate that you have a fever, till you are really hot. If I choose to use a thermometer instead, you will be able to explain that weird tiredness you are experiencing and go to bed to rest before you get a crazy high fever. But why? Is it because our sensor is cheap and low quality? Or is it because the differences that we want to differentiate are too tiny for our sensor? Or maybe is that we don’t have installed the proper drivers or trained the algorithm enough to be able to say how much? I wonder if someone can answer conclusively to any of these questions.
But of course, the fun here is to think what could be happening.
In terms of if our sensor is made with good quality materials… we could go one by one and try to make a comparison with other animals with similar sensors, for example. We could say that our vision is lower quality than a mantis shrimp, but much better than a mole. Or maybe, compare it with technology? Wow, that’s a good stat… our eyes are over the fastest high resolution, at different focus and lights, than any photographic camera. But yeah, perceiving temperatures or quantifying electric currents, any cheap instrument or even a platypus, will do better than you.
Let’s think about the fact of receiving enough signal. With temperature, well… it’s true that quantify the temperature of a hot needle is trickier than a hot knife, or the water of a jacuzzi (when being all, of course, at the same temperature), but is also true that the limiting factor here is to not burn the chip. With light is obvious that the amount of it varies a lot inside our range of perception. So if we use these two sensors for concluding, eyes are better sensors measuring light than skin and our nervous system are to measure temperature. But…, what if the temperature is just one of many magnitudes that our skin-sensor can quantify? The comparison now becomes a little bit unfair, since we are talking about one of the best multisensors that I can think about, a multimeter becomes a joke of diversity. Temperature, pressure, wind speed, flavours, light?, a little bit of sound in case you need it, tickles… and not only their magnitude, with many you can even get directionality! It is a vector quantification machine!!
But well… who cares about what is a lot or what is tiny, I just wanted you to think about it with me. But I want to finish with the training of our algorithm and installing drivers, the last part. And in case you were wondering, this is where art, food and science enter in the equation. The world of flavours is one I didn’t know it existed till some years ago. We don’t use many spices in Galicia.. so even we use really delicious and intense flavours, combinations are usually kept quite simple. I’m starting to understand that my sensitivity and flavour detection capabilities are not limited by my sensor, either by the signal, the training of my neural network is what is missing here. I am starting to learn how to identify them, one by one, collecting many data points, trying to focus in limiting and locating them inside some sort of a scale, to then detect and enjoy multiple and weird combinations. Apparently, colours are like this. Colours are complex, but how we visualise them in our brain is an idea, is part of a calibration scale we made. Maybe in a less conscious way than flavours, maybe we come with some preinstalled drivers, but that’s just because colours help us more with natural selection than flavours, but we can learn them too. These are just two interesting examples, but think about what are the limits of this. We can train our algorithm and learn with practice and experiencing becoming a more accurate, optimised, and expert machine. And the science… I will let it to you to figure it out where it fits.
Header image: Josef Albers, Portfolio ‘Homage to the Square’. From here.
🛸 🌎 ° 🌓 • .°• 🚀 ✯
★ * ° 🛰 °· 🪐
. • ° ★ • ☄
▁▂▃▄▅▆▇▇▆▅▄▃▁▂. -
Why ScienceAfterAll?
I got enough about people telling me what I can do, what I am supposed to do and how I suppose to think; and yes, today I’m annoyed about this because their voices have broken my self-confidence. I was waiting to start this “little universe” until one of those days when other people’s assumptions make me weaker, less valuable, less confident and less everything. I wanted to be emotionally weak to start this because I wanted to create a place for people who secretly carry these feelings too. Curious minds who don’t fit in the middle of the others, genuine humans whose ideas are rejected, the ones who need a place to share their precious thoughts without having to compromise their values. Also those who need to activate their brains with a little bit of raw and beautiful knowledge.
I would be a fool if I started this project alone. Combining the perspectives of these curious minds orbiting around society, makes our approach stronger and easier to avoid getting stuck into just one perspective, topic or whichever ‘scientific-label’ is on trend. I want to create this universe for that almost extinct bunch of humans. I have met gorgeous people in my life that taught me incredible things, not only about science and reality, but also about how they understand knowledge and learning. A common trend is founding them alone, keeping all their magic secretly inside, quitting from Science forever, used to stay hidden, burnt out after fighting society in order to make a better change for society. Here, all these incredible humans can encourage and motivate each other, not only sharing ideas, but also sharing feelings, thoughts and their life vision and values. This is a place where knowledge is understood from ignorance. So, if you are one of those and If you want to collaborate or just read something that makes your brain work, you are very very welcome.
If there is one thing I’ve learnt pretty well about science is that making too many assumptions is going to give you an inaccurate solution. It could be close to reality, maybe, but never fully true. Assumptions are based in human ego and ignorance, as religion does. If the explanation is ‘there is God who does miracles’, it is easy to not call ourselves stupid or just a ‘bunch of dumb humans in an insignificant piece of rock in the middle of an infinite universe full of wonders that we cannot even imagine’. Quite disappointing. So, what it’s intelligence? Is it the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills? This is quite an egocentric human definition. Are plants intelligent? Are viruses intelligent? Is a rock intelligent? Is humanity as a group acquiring useful and proper knowledge and skills? What is the difference between a plague and a conqueror? In the moment that someone, or humanity, starts thinking ‘yes, I totally got this, everything is controlled and I can do what I want without consequences’, is doomed. Oh… yes… wait… I forgot for a second that we are already.
Finally, I want to write my feelings and my thoughts because I’m pretty sure they are not so silly. My life, and for sure yours too, is full of people telling you what you are doing ok and what you are not, but this is like reality: no one knows nothing about your infinite universe inside you. So, in my personal experience, everyone of us is going to be defined by others and society and yes, the problem starts when you believe what they say. Remember that the Earth was once the centre of the Universe and I’m going to add something that any scientist would hate: science is never even close to the reality. But…. that’s the fun, isn’t it?
And please, don’t get me wrong, this is not a place for “Flat-Earthers”, it’s a place based on logic, reason, curiosity and observations through the scientific method, where all opinions are valid since you respect others and you use your brain. Even though we are going to focus on science topics (yes, of course, we are passionate about it) but we also want to touch on crazy topics that make us think in different ways with uncommon points of view. Remember that the world is beautiful and exciting, but not the humanity we are creating.
Do not be a simple human, use your brain, think more, decide what you want to decide, find the centre of your universe. And do it, just keeping always in mind that everything is science after all.Header image: Copernican heliocentrism illustration, from the Harmonia Macrocosmica of Andreas Cellarius (1660).
🛸 🌎 ° 🌓 • .°• 🚀 ✯
★ * ° 🛰 °· 🪐
. • ° ★ • ☄
▁▂▃▄▅▆▇▇▆▅▄▃▁▂.